<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Your screencasting experience?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://meredith.wolfwater.com/wordpress/2005/05/16/your-screencasting-experience/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://meredith.wolfwater.com/wordpress/2005/05/16/your-screencasting-experience/</link>
	<description>A librarian, writer and educator reflecting on the profession and the tools we use to serve our patrons</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 09:11:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason</title>
		<link>http://meredith.wolfwater.com/wordpress/2005/05/16/your-screencasting-experience/comment-page-1/#comment-6495</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 May 2005 21:17:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">/?p=224#comment-6495</guid>
		<description>I have used both WME and Wink and found them both very effective.  The major drawback with WME is that files cannot be saved to swf format, while the major downside to Wink is the lack of audio support (so far). Am I complaining about freebies? Absolutely not, but these are factors that must be taken into consideration in choosing a piece of software.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have used both WME and Wink and found them both very effective.  The major drawback with WME is that files cannot be saved to swf format, while the major downside to Wink is the lack of audio support (so far). Am I complaining about freebies? Absolutely not, but these are factors that must be taken into consideration in choosing a piece of software.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

