« Talkin’ wikis in Lansing, MI | Home | Application Deadline: Five Weeks to a Social Library »

LibWorm: Searching, syndicating and aggregating the bibliblogosphere

By Meredith Farkas | November 25, 2006

A few months ago, David Rothman asked me if there was any tool for searching the biblioblogosphere. At the time, there really wasn’t much. I told him about LISFeeds, but explained that its search functionality was very limited. And that was the last I heard on the subject from him until a few days ago when he sent me a link to LibWorm, an amazing search tool that he created with Frankie Dolan of MedWorm. LibWorm searches over 1,000 feeds from the blogosphere and related Websites.

Some very cool things about it:

I think Technorati is great for a lot of things, but when I subscribed to a search for wikis there, I ended up with a ridiculous amount of stuff that was totally irrelevant to what I really was looking for. Considering the limited net this search engine is casting, the results are much more likely to be relevant. Congratulations to David and Frankie! You have created an amazing resource for the library community!

Topics: RSS and Syndication, search | 7 Comments »

7 Responses to “LibWorm: Searching, syndicating and aggregating the bibliblogosphere”

  1. Joshua Says:
    November 25th, 2006 at 3:40 pm

    http://blogsearch.google.com/ still does a better job IMO ;-)

  2. David Rothman Says:
    November 26th, 2006 at 12:12 am

    Hi Joshua-

    Sure I use Google Blog Search, too. But LibWorm doesn’t just search blogs, and can be limited just to biblioblogs instead of the entire blogosphere.

    Comparing LibWorm with Google Blog Search is like comparing A wrench to a hammer. They’re both tools, but they really have different ideal uses.

    Best,

    -David Rothman
    http://davidrothman.net

  3. joshua m. neff Says:
    November 26th, 2006 at 1:48 pm

    I agree with the other Joshua. If only for the egocentric reason that my own blog shows up in a Google blog search, but not in a LibWorm search.

  4. Meredith Farkas Says:
    November 26th, 2006 at 5:46 pm

    Joshua (Neff) — if you just let David know, I’m sure he’d be happy to add you to the sites that are searched by LibWorm. :)

    I have to agree with David on this one. I don’t think it’s an either/or issue. Google Blog Search is great for searching blogs, while LibWorm is great for searching content specific to our field and more than just blogs.

  5. David Rothman Says:
    November 26th, 2006 at 8:08 pm

    Hello Joshua Neff!

    Yes, please do send all your feed URLs our way so we can make sure they get added. Qualifying for inclusion in LibWorm is pretty easy. You must: (1)Have a valid feed and (2)be about librarianship. Meet those qualifications and your feeds WILL be included. There’s a form for submitting feeds at LibWorm.

    Best,

    -David Rothman
    http://libworm.com
    http://davidrothman.net

  6. joshua m. neff Says:
    November 26th, 2006 at 9:23 pm

    Wow, thanks, David!

  7. Robert Teeter Says:
    November 28th, 2006 at 3:43 pm

    I was poking around customsearchguide.com and found that ALA seems to be working on a Google custome search engine called Librarian’s Library. Don’t know if this is widely known or not.