Comments on: Introducing WOMBLINK (sadly, having nothing to do with wombats)

By: Binky

Binky — Sun, 04 Mar 2007 18:17:14 +0000

(Now we can all reflect what a “womb-bat” would look like..!)

Of course, a wombat looks like this: http://www.wombania.com/wombats

By: joshua m. neff

joshua m. neff — Fri, 08 Dec 2006 16:04:40 +0000

If I get in touch with my wombat side in public, I could get arrested.

(Now we can all reflect what a “womb-bat” would look like..!)

And now my brain is broken.

By: K.G. Schneider

K.G. Schneider — Fri, 08 Dec 2006 11:02:15 +0000

Not to be a crassly amateur linguist, but if it were to make us think of wombats, the word would have to be womlink. wom*bat, wom*link. The break is at the syllable. A silly syllable point! (Now we can all reflect what a “womb-bat” would look like..!)

By: Meredith Farkas

Meredith Farkas — Fri, 08 Dec 2006 00:31:26 +0000

maybe you all need to be more in touch with your wombat side

By: joshua m. neff

joshua m. neff — Fri, 08 Dec 2006 00:13:27 +0000

I must be in touch with my feminine side, because I thought “womb,” too.

By: Meredith Farkas

Meredith Farkas — Thu, 07 Dec 2006 20:58:36 +0000

Guess I need to get more in touch with my feminine side!

By: Rachel

Rachel — Thu, 07 Dec 2006 15:16:09 +0000

I thought “womb,” too. Which is funnier!

By: Meredith Farkas

Meredith Farkas — Thu, 07 Dec 2006 13:54:51 +0000

That’s funny. You think womb, I think wombat.

By: K.G. Schneider

K.G. Schneider — Thu, 07 Dec 2006 12:31:12 +0000

Such an… um… feminine name!