<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A lesson in bad customer service: Pottery Barn Kids</title>
	<atom:link href="http://meredith.wolfwater.com/wordpress/2009/01/02/a-lesson-in-bad-customer-service-pottery-barn-kids/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://meredith.wolfwater.com/wordpress/2009/01/02/a-lesson-in-bad-customer-service-pottery-barn-kids/</link>
	<description>A librarian, writer and tech geek reflecting on the profession and the tools we use to serve our patrons</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 13:59:34 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Marianne Hebert</title>
		<link>http://meredith.wolfwater.com/wordpress/2009/01/02/a-lesson-in-bad-customer-service-pottery-barn-kids/comment-page-1/#comment-187351</link>
		<dc:creator>Marianne Hebert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 19:09:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meredith.wolfwater.com/wordpress/?p=968#comment-187351</guid>
		<description>Here&#039;s a &quot;good&quot; story about customer service.  This past weekend while traveling in Connecticut, I stopped into the LL Bean outlet store with my sister-in-law, Sheila.  I told Sheila that LL Bean has a great return policy...they will take anything back, any time, no questions asked.  She said no way...so I said watch this --&gt; While I was checking out (having purchased a few sale items) I asked the clerk if I could return the coat I was wearing (an LL Bean all weather parka I had purchased in 1997?).  It was a bit frayed around the  cuffs, not to mention very worn and a bit dirty.  They clerk asked if I had my receipt. I said no. She said then all she could refund me would be the last sale price on the item.  She was willing to take it back then and there, no questions asked.  She didn&#039;t even blink.  Well I didn&#039;t return the coat, as I actually like my coat. Personally, I think that returning an over-used item after ten years, is pushing the envelope a bit...but I appreciated the clerks willingness to observe their policy and especially liked that she did not treat me like I was weird or crazy, even if my request was a bit weird and crazy.  I like the quality of customer service I get from LL Bean, which is why I am a returning customer.

Developing a culture of trust may not be such a difficult thing to do.  LL Bean would not have such a long standing policy if all their customers abused it.  I agree with you, Meredith on the idea that good policies and good experiences in libraries can translate into lifelong opinions about libraries.  We might learn a thing or two from companies like Nordstrom and LL Bean...take the good and leave the bad behind.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here&#8217;s a &#8220;good&#8221; story about customer service.  This past weekend while traveling in Connecticut, I stopped into the LL Bean outlet store with my sister-in-law, Sheila.  I told Sheila that LL Bean has a great return policy&#8230;they will take anything back, any time, no questions asked.  She said no way&#8230;so I said watch this &#8211;&gt; While I was checking out (having purchased a few sale items) I asked the clerk if I could return the coat I was wearing (an LL Bean all weather parka I had purchased in 1997?).  It was a bit frayed around the  cuffs, not to mention very worn and a bit dirty.  They clerk asked if I had my receipt. I said no. She said then all she could refund me would be the last sale price on the item.  She was willing to take it back then and there, no questions asked.  She didn&#8217;t even blink.  Well I didn&#8217;t return the coat, as I actually like my coat. Personally, I think that returning an over-used item after ten years, is pushing the envelope a bit&#8230;but I appreciated the clerks willingness to observe their policy and especially liked that she did not treat me like I was weird or crazy, even if my request was a bit weird and crazy.  I like the quality of customer service I get from LL Bean, which is why I am a returning customer.</p>
<p>Developing a culture of trust may not be such a difficult thing to do.  LL Bean would not have such a long standing policy if all their customers abused it.  I agree with you, Meredith on the idea that good policies and good experiences in libraries can translate into lifelong opinions about libraries.  We might learn a thing or two from companies like Nordstrom and LL Bean&#8230;take the good and leave the bad behind.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: customer service experience</title>
		<link>http://meredith.wolfwater.com/wordpress/2009/01/02/a-lesson-in-bad-customer-service-pottery-barn-kids/comment-page-1/#comment-187330</link>
		<dc:creator>customer service experience</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Jan 2009 20:20:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meredith.wolfwater.com/wordpress/?p=968#comment-187330</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s pretty bad Jon. I haven&#039;t heard of an employee pretending to be a customer to avoid work, but it doesn&#039;t surprise me.  That&#039;s why I think it&#039;s essential that companies use mystery shoppers.  Mystery shopping isn&#039;t about catching employee&#039;s doing things wrong, it&#039;s about catching them doing things right and rewarding that positive behavior, but shoppers certainly do catch employees doing things wrong.  Mystery shops hold both the managers and teh employees accountable, and just knowing that he/she may be mystery shopped usually keeps employees from doing things like that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s pretty bad Jon. I haven&#8217;t heard of an employee pretending to be a customer to avoid work, but it doesn&#8217;t surprise me.  That&#8217;s why I think it&#8217;s essential that companies use mystery shoppers.  Mystery shopping isn&#8217;t about catching employee&#8217;s doing things wrong, it&#8217;s about catching them doing things right and rewarding that positive behavior, but shoppers certainly do catch employees doing things wrong.  Mystery shops hold both the managers and teh employees accountable, and just knowing that he/she may be mystery shopped usually keeps employees from doing things like that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jon warren</title>
		<link>http://meredith.wolfwater.com/wordpress/2009/01/02/a-lesson-in-bad-customer-service-pottery-barn-kids/comment-page-1/#comment-187303</link>
		<dc:creator>jon warren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 20:47:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meredith.wolfwater.com/wordpress/?p=968#comment-187303</guid>
		<description>Dillards lost me as a customer 4 years ago.  They were very busy in the girls department and one of the cashiers was helping a co-worker purchase a dress.  I asked the coworker if I can be taken care of but she told me she is a customer too.  I told her NO she is not because she has her nametag on, she is behind the counter taking up my time and my times and money is what pays her salary.  The manage did nothing to offer me assistance, did not appologize and they lost me as a customer forever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dillards lost me as a customer 4 years ago.  They were very busy in the girls department and one of the cashiers was helping a co-worker purchase a dress.  I asked the coworker if I can be taken care of but she told me she is a customer too.  I told her NO she is not because she has her nametag on, she is behind the counter taking up my time and my times and money is what pays her salary.  The manage did nothing to offer me assistance, did not appologize and they lost me as a customer forever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean C. Rowan</title>
		<link>http://meredith.wolfwater.com/wordpress/2009/01/02/a-lesson-in-bad-customer-service-pottery-barn-kids/comment-page-1/#comment-187269</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean C. Rowan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 21:12:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meredith.wolfwater.com/wordpress/?p=968#comment-187269</guid>
		<description>Okay, you want to see &lt;a href=&quot;http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09%2F01%2F04%2F1846229&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;bad customer service&lt;/a&gt;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, you want to see <a href="http://tech.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=09%2F01%2F04%2F1846229" rel="nofollow">bad customer service</a>?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dean C. Rowan</title>
		<link>http://meredith.wolfwater.com/wordpress/2009/01/02/a-lesson-in-bad-customer-service-pottery-barn-kids/comment-page-1/#comment-187268</link>
		<dc:creator>Dean C. Rowan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2009 19:55:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://meredith.wolfwater.com/wordpress/?p=968#comment-187268</guid>
		<description>I have my own letter to write to Southwest Airlines for (yet again) botching up a customer service opportunity this holiday flight season, but that&#039;s another story. Let me take a devil&#039;s advocate&#039;s approach to your message to libraries: I think we&#039;ve spent too much time thinking about customer service, too little time recognizing that good service comes from refining the work we do with the stuff to which we do it. I recently read an article in a professional organization&#039;s monthly update to membership, yet another round of &quot;We need to serve our users more like Nordstrom serves its customers.&quot; This is a stunningly bad idea. First, Nordstrom is clearly in the business of turning profits, nothing more. The occasionally nice--or even better, sartorially tasteful--sales clerk can indeed make the shopping experience a positive one, but it ultimately isn&#039;t why one shops at Nordstrom. One shops there for the clothing (or whatever) lines, the convenience, sometimes the quality, all full well knowing one pays a very high premium to do so. Second, has it ever occurred to librarians that Nordstrom likely learned about satisfying its customers by observing how people are served at, for example, public libraries?

You &quot;really wonder...if these companies understand what they’re losing when they&quot; pick nits with customers rather than aim for unconditional satisfaction. Of course, they do know. It&#039;s built into the operation. Nevertheless, I bet if you write a letter, you&#039;ll get both an apology and satisfaction. Otherwise, your loyalty stands for nothing, inasmuch as they have no efficient way to measure it. You must tell them, and by &quot;them&quot; I don&#039;t mean the front line service operator over the 800 number.

There is no assurance that well served public library customers &quot;will vote in the affirmative on bond issues that positively impact the library and will perhaps even join their local library’s Friends organization.&quot; In fact, these are unlikely outcomes. Most well served patrons do not join the Friends, and bond issues are notoriously hard to win, even in communities where libraries do the very best they can with little financial support. This is no argument for providing bad customer service, nor against good, of course. It simply points out matters of fact, and reminds us to focus on excelling at the work of librarianship. That excellence will manifest itself, among other ways, in confident, empathetic, good-spirited staffs who enjoy working with library patrons, even those whose demands challenge the library&#039;s policies.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have my own letter to write to Southwest Airlines for (yet again) botching up a customer service opportunity this holiday flight season, but that&#8217;s another story. Let me take a devil&#8217;s advocate&#8217;s approach to your message to libraries: I think we&#8217;ve spent too much time thinking about customer service, too little time recognizing that good service comes from refining the work we do with the stuff to which we do it. I recently read an article in a professional organization&#8217;s monthly update to membership, yet another round of &#8220;We need to serve our users more like Nordstrom serves its customers.&#8221; This is a stunningly bad idea. First, Nordstrom is clearly in the business of turning profits, nothing more. The occasionally nice&#8211;or even better, sartorially tasteful&#8211;sales clerk can indeed make the shopping experience a positive one, but it ultimately isn&#8217;t why one shops at Nordstrom. One shops there for the clothing (or whatever) lines, the convenience, sometimes the quality, all full well knowing one pays a very high premium to do so. Second, has it ever occurred to librarians that Nordstrom likely learned about satisfying its customers by observing how people are served at, for example, public libraries?</p>
<p>You &#8220;really wonder&#8230;if these companies understand what they’re losing when they&#8221; pick nits with customers rather than aim for unconditional satisfaction. Of course, they do know. It&#8217;s built into the operation. Nevertheless, I bet if you write a letter, you&#8217;ll get both an apology and satisfaction. Otherwise, your loyalty stands for nothing, inasmuch as they have no efficient way to measure it. You must tell them, and by &#8220;them&#8221; I don&#8217;t mean the front line service operator over the 800 number.</p>
<p>There is no assurance that well served public library customers &#8220;will vote in the affirmative on bond issues that positively impact the library and will perhaps even join their local library’s Friends organization.&#8221; In fact, these are unlikely outcomes. Most well served patrons do not join the Friends, and bond issues are notoriously hard to win, even in communities where libraries do the very best they can with little financial support. This is no argument for providing bad customer service, nor against good, of course. It simply points out matters of fact, and reminds us to focus on excelling at the work of librarianship. That excellence will manifest itself, among other ways, in confident, empathetic, good-spirited staffs who enjoy working with library patrons, even those whose demands challenge the library&#8217;s policies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
