Survey of the Biblioblogosphere: Results

I just finished writing up all of the results of the Survey of the Biblioblogosphere. The results have been broken down into four parts. Since I posted them in the order in which I wrote them, I thought I’d put links to them here for easier retrieval.

I hope you find the results as interesting as I do! And to those who participated, thanks again for giving us all a clearer picture of the “Biblioblogosphere”.

What do you find interesting about the results? I hope people will respond to the results — either on my blog or to their own blog — sharing their own observations and insights.

9 Comments

  1. Yeah, my spam filters are pretty aggressive. They have to be, though.

  2. Warum BibliothekarInnen bloggen

    Walt Crawford hatte ja in einer der letzten Ausgaben von Cites and Insights eine Analyse der Biblioblogosphere angefangen. Meredith Farkas hat daraufhin eine Umfrage gestartet und stellt die Ergebnisse jetzt vor. Einige interessante Ergebnisse finden …

  3. Alane

    Very interesting, Meredith. Ton of work too, I’ll bet. I wonder how this profile tracks against the general library community? Top of the head guesses: generally younger, generally more male, leaning toward academia.
    As I was reading, I wondered if bloggers–especially those of us closer to 50 than 40 (just because of the amount of time we’ve worked) –have been more likely to adopt/try new stuff in our careers. For myself, I answer ‘yes’ and although not all my “trends” turned into permanent parts of library work, I learned a lot every time.

  4. Esse tipo de ferramenta é verdadeiramente importante para sabermos se estamos agradando.
    Um abraço

Comments are closed