« | Home | »

The good, the bad and the utterly hillarious

By Meredith Farkas | October 8, 2006

I have been ridiculously busy getting ready for the five talks I have coming up in the next three weeks. I have to have the slides for them all totally done this week because I’m going on vacation from the 13th until the start of Internet Librarian. And, for the first time in a long time, this will be a work-free, e-mail free vacation. For over a year, I’ve been using vacations to work on my book or whatever other project I have going on. And then I figure, since I’m working anyways, I might as well check my work e-mail and answer some of the more important ones. UGH! This time, that will not happen. Cell phones will be off and computers will only be used to find out what hours the wineries in Napa and Sonoma are open. And I plan to spend most of my vacation in no condition to be answering e-mails anyways. :)

There have been a lot of topics that have caught my interest lately — from the Learning 2.0 initiative at PLCMC to Paul Pival and David Rothman’s discussions of why students have a hard time distinguishing scholarly sources from those that are decidedly not (and here’s another article on that topic from Educause). Since I don’t have time to go into any real depth right now on any of these topics, I figured I could at least point you to the articles and blog posts that I’ve found interesting lately in the hopes that you will get something useful out of them.

Here’s, the good…

…the Bad (well, not that bad)…

… and of course, the utterly hillarious!

Topics: librarianship, online education, our digital future, social software | No Comments »

Comments are closed.